What’s new in the initiative: We’ve published case studies of deliberative participatory processes from |
What’s new in the initiative: We’ve published case studies of deliberative participatory processes from |
Polish version >>> see here
The regional initiative „Voice & vote – let’s rise above public consultation” was implemented with the financial support of the Active Citizens Fund, a program funded by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway under the EEA and Norwegian Funds 2014-2021. We created a space to exchange knowledge and compare experiences and perspectives from different European countries. Initiative was led by Shipyard Foundation, a member of a consortium running the Active Citizen Fund Poland (ACF Poland). The invitation was extended primarily to ACF Grantees from beneficiary countries, but also to anyone interested in the topic.
Recent years have brought an international discussion on the challenges of involving citizens in decision-making processes: how to ensure a greater diversity of participants and the possibility for different views to resonate? How to get qualitative findings? How to address difficult and controversial topics in an increasingly polarized society?
In the search for new approach, local governments and community organizations have started to turn to methods, using random sampling, ensuring representativeness, a longer process, incorporating deliberation based on expert knowledge*. Assemblies, councils or citizens’ juries are thus used. We can see that there is no turning point from this path. The European Union has even made it compulsory to include citizens’ panels in the process of making important legal changes.
We wanted to search for and exchange knowledge about good, advanced deliberative initiatives that present more complex participative methods. As such we treated processes like:
We talked about the good practices in the field of deliberative processes and shared first reflections related to local challenges in the beneficiary countries.
Presentation from the webinar: part 1 (introduction) and part 2 (good practices)
🕵️ During the summer we’ve been collecting examples of deliberative processes from the Active Citizens Funds support area. We were interested in processes which:
📚 You can download our publication here!
The aim of the meeting was primarily to learn about examples of deliberative participatory processes from the Active Citizens Funds support area and to exchange experiences. During the meeting, we created a space for joint reflection on the shape of these processes and their impact on democratic practices in individual countries, as well as on solutions that bring the best results in terms of the quality of conversation on public issues. We also envisaged a section dedicated to networking and relationship building.
We presented and discussed:
The meeting is primarily open to ACF grantees from the beneficiary countries, that are involved in participatory processes and seeking methods for in-depth, qualitative conversations on public issues, but also to anyone interested in this topic. The meeting will be held in English.
Presentations from the meeting:
Into the rules of deliberative processes – How to do it? Education part by Mateusz Wojcieszak
Diving into practice. First wave: citizens’ assembly by Eva Bordos, Maria Jagaciak, Natalia Novakova, Karel Kolář
Diving into practice. Second wave: citizens’ councils by Mateusz Wojcieszak, Agnieszka Duda-Jastrzębska, Tadeusz Mincer
Diving into practice. Third wave: citizens’ juries by Agnes Janka Gyor, Kacper Lubiewski
Here you can download the program:
Our Initiative is run in collaboration with group of partners from:
* For the purpose of better understanding the subject, we will refer to the OECD publication “Catching the deliberative wave”. They understand the wave as a process, where: Public authorities from all levels of government increasingly turn to Citizens’ Assemblies, Juries, Panels and other representative deliberative processes to tackle complex policy problems ranging from climate change to infrastructure investment decisions. They convene groups of people representing a wide cross-section of society for at least one full day – and often much longer – to learn, deliberate, and develop collective recommendations that consider the complexities and compromises required for solving multifaceted public issues. We would like to create space for exchanging knowledge, comparing different countries and perspectives and learning from each other on the European level (AO beneficiary countries oriented) and see if and how we, in our countries, catch the deliberative wave.
Polish version >>> see here